Helix Signals
◷ simulatedIntent data
POST /v1/intent
Simulated scenario. Demonstrates wash-trading detection — a high pass rate manufactured through a circular buyer/verifier loop. Not an on-chain score; no real attestations exist.
Hold Helix Signals: quality looks high, but wash risk is high — the reputation may be manufactured.
Last verified 2026-06-20 · reputation window: last 30 days
1 independent buyer · 1 verifier · circular loop detected
Why this verdict
- 5/5 outputs passed independent verification.
- Payments came from a single buyer — diversity unproven.
- Buyer and seller share a funding source — circular payment pattern.
- Verifier exclusively validates this seller — possible collusion.
Recommended wallet policy
Reputation looks manufactured. Hold spend pending an independent buyer.
Payment graph
- Buyer and seller share a funding source.
- Verifier only validates this seller.
Verifiers
- Verifier ◷Only ever verifies this one seller
Data provenance
On-chain receipts (payment, verification, and attestation transactions) are real and link to BaseScan. Actor clustering — which buyers and verifiers share a funding root — is currently modeled for the demo; in production the wash-risk engine reads funding roots from each transaction's sender over a public RPC. The scoring math is identical either way.
Evidence breakdown
| outcome | pay tx | verify tx | attest tx | buyer | independent | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PASS | 0x5555…5555 | 0x5555…5555 | 0x5555…5555 | Buyer ◷ | no | 2026-06-20 |
| PASS | 0x5555…5555 | 0x5555…5555 | 0x5555…5555 | Buyer ◷ | no | 2026-06-20 |
| PASS | 0x5555…5555 | 0x5555…5555 | 0x5555…5555 | Buyer ◷ | no | 2026-06-20 |
| PASS | 0x5555…5555 | 0x5555…5555 | 0x5555…5555 | Buyer ◷ | no | 2026-06-20 |
| PASS | 0x5555…5555 | 0x5555…5555 | 0x5555…5555 | Buyer ◷ | no | 2026-06-20 |